The HIJACKED of Christ and Mary - Virgin Birth Deception - Semiramis and Tammuz

Ahayah Yashiya's Blog

 

John 8:31-32
King James Version (KJV)

31 Then said YASHAYA to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed;

32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

First I'm going to PROVE to you that the Messiah our Savior whose name is YASHAYA is NOT God but came in his Father's name to do his work.

John 6:38
King James Version (KJV)

38 For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me.

John 5:43
King James Version (KJV)

43 I am come in my Father's name, and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive.


The Messiah YASHIYA is the SON of the Most High thy Power BEFORE there was any such WORD as MARY.

He was GREAT in ALL his POWER since the CREATION before MARY.


In order to understand this, you MUST know what the Christian Church is promoting.

SO, YOU HAVE TO UNDERSTAND THE VIRGIN BIRTH CONCEPT!

By saying the Messiah YASHIYA came without a FATHER is really upholding MARY as a Female Deity above all Women on earth as a Goddess.

It has LITTLE to do with what they are claiming about the Messiah but more so it has to do with the upholding of a Babylonian Deity they are calling MARY.

The VIRGIN BIRTH you have been thought is NOT the VIRGIN BIRTH of the Messiah.

The Messiah you're learning about in the Christian Churches have nothing to do with the Messiah written in Scriptures.

There was a VIRGIN BIRTH before the Messiah and Mary existed, and that's the VIRGIN BIRTH you're following in the WESTERN AND EASTERN WORLD. It was the ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH that brought a NEW Messiah to our people after being ENSLAVED.

They just use the Messiah and Mary's name but it was really TAMMUZ and SEMIRAMIS.

TAMMUZ was a BABYLONIAN Virgin Birth Child that was worshiped every SUNday in ancient Babylon.

Do You Understand?

Let me PROVE to you that the Virgin Birth they worship on SUNday is NOT the Messiah YASHIYA out of the Bible.

Ezekiel 8:14-16
King James Version (KJV)

14 Then he brought me to the door of the gate of the Lord's house which was toward the north; and, behold, there sat women weeping for TAMMUZ.

15 Then said he unto me, Hast thou seen this, O son of man? turn thee yet again, and thou shalt see greater abominations than these.

16 And he brought me into the inner court of the Lord's house, and, behold, at the door of the temple of the Lord, between the porch and the altar, were about five and twenty men, with their backs toward the temple of the Lord, and their faces toward the east; and they worshipped the SUN toward the east.

TAMMUZ was a Virgin Birth of Semiramis - Your Easter or Astarte or aka MARY - Your Queen of Heaven.

A Virgin Birth does not mean that a woman NEVER had INTERCOURSE, that's what you've thought to follow an ANTICHRIST.

Jeremiah 44:15-19
King James Version (KJV)

15 Then all the men which knew that their wives had burned incense unto other gods, and all the women that stood by, a great multitude, even all the people that dwelt in the land of Egypt, in Pathros, answered Jeremiah, saying,

16 As for the word that thou hast spoken unto us in the name of the Lord, we will not hearken unto thee.

17 But we will certainly do whatsoever thing goeth forth out of our own mouth, to burn incense unto the QUEEN of HEAVEN, and to pour out drink offerings unto her, as we have done, we, and our fathers, our kings, and our princes, in the cities of Judah, and in the streets of Jerusalem: for then had we plenty of victuals, and were well, and saw no evil.

18 But since we left off to burn incense to the QUEEN of HEAVEN, and to pour out drink offerings unto her, we have wanted all things, and have been consumed by the sword and by the famine.

19 And when we burned incense to the QUEEN of HEAVEN, and poured out drink offerings unto her, did we make her cakes to worship her, and pour out drink offerings unto her, without our men?

This was 1/2 a century before the Messiah was born.

Matthew 24:4-7
King James Version (KJV)

4 And YASHAYA answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you.

5 For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.

6 And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet.

7 For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places.


Genesis 6:1-5
King James Version (KJV)

1 And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them,

2 That the sons of God (Angels) saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.

3 And the Lord said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.

4 There were GIANTS (NEPHILIMS) in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.

5 And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.

After this happened wickedness was thought within the earth before the flood and the Most High came to Noah and said build an ark, I'm going to DESTROY the earth with water based on the EVIL between CELESTIAL/ANGELS and people.

SO, LET'S MAKE THIS CLEAR:

The Most High DESTROYED and JUDGED the ANGELS that came down and SIN by sleeping with women and bear child, BUT then later he comes and IMPREGNATES woman and bring forth a SAVIOR.

mmm.... could it be that the DEMONS and the people that's following the FALLEN ANGELS in the CATHOLIC CHURCH SWITCHED off the Messiah YASHAYA and MARY so you can follow the same FALLEN ANGELS the Most High JUDGED - ABSOLUTELY.

There making the people following ZEUS which they claim ZEUS dealt with women and make DEMI GODS. That's what the ROMAN and CATHOLICS belief and teach. They began to teach off the same boats and that's why they injected the VIRGIN BIRTH and teaching it so that we can believe in DEMI GODS, the same DEMI GODS which are ANGELS of Gods that dealt with women and have children.

Now, Is the Most High thy Power the Messiah's Father? OF COURSE.

I will now PROVE this and the Messiah YASHAYA was before JOSEPH and MARY.

John 1:1
King James Version (KJV)

1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

The WORD was the Messiah, he was part of ALAHAYAM that created everything in the beginning. So, if he bare RECORDS from the FATHER that means he was from there in the beginning.

Here is the PRECEPT PROOF to this


1 John 5:7
King James Version (KJV)

7 For there are THREE that bear RECORD in heaven, the FATHER, the WORD, and the HOLY SPIRIT: and these three are one.

So, we have to ACKNOWLEDGE the Messiah's Power NOT because of MARY, but because He was in the beginning and he was ALWAYS the SON of the Most High, and it doesn't change how he came on earth, BUT the ROMANS would like you to focus on that so that you could uphold their FEMALE DEITY and can worship their PAGAN Gods.

LET ME PROVE THIS TO YOU.

Romans 1:3-4
King James Version (KJV)

3 Concerning his Son YASHAYA the Messiah our Lord, which was made of the SEED of David according to the FLESH;

4 And declared to be the SON of the Most High with power, according to the spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead:

Now let's look up the origin of the word SEED

Strong's G4690

σπέρμα

sperma

sper'-mah


From G4687; something sown, that is, seed (including the male "sperm"); by implication offspring; specifically a remnant (figuratively as if kept over for planting): - issue, seed.


Now through the SPIRIT he was the SON of the Most High because that was the first SPIRIT CREATED from the beginning.

The SPIRIT overshadowed MARY, that's the SPIRIT that came in her during the time of conception, BUT it still took a PHYSICAL SEED (SPERMA) to have his PHYSICAL PART come.

She was already PREGNATED by JOSEPH before the family came together. You have to READ Deuteronomy chapter 22 to UNDERSTAND the scenario of Matthew chapter 1 that shows the lineage of KINGS, SOLOMON promise down to the Messiah.

So Mary Lineage was through her father NATHAN and she also had more sons and daughters.

This is WHY also your so-called Jewish/Ashkenazi people in Israel and America got their concept of lineage through a woman.


LET ME PROVE THIS AGAIN

Acts 2:29-30
King James Version (KJV)

29 Men and brethren, let me freely speak unto you of the patriarch David, that he is both dead and buried, and his sepulcher is with us unto this day.

30 Therefore being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him, that of the fruit of his LOINS, according to the FLESH, he would raise up MESSIAH to sit on his throne;

Fruit of his LOINS (SPERMA) according to the FLESH.

Do you even know that John the Baptist, the Messiah first cousin from mother Elizabeth, Mary's cousin, that he was born of the HOLY SPIRIT 6 months before the Messiah?

So was John the Baptist also a VIRGIN child before the Messiah.

And if so, WHY aren't they holding up that. See below for further details.

Being born of a HOLY SPIRIT does not mean you don't have a FATHER.

It may come as a shock to many Christians that the VIRGIN BIRTH DOCTRINE has its origin back to Egypt and Babylon.

Here are the Biblical Proof:


Prophecy of a Virgin being found with Child:

Isaiah 7:14 Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.

Hebrews did not had no such word as VIRGIN in their vocabulary. Virgin in fact is a Greek word.

Here's the word that should be in Isaiah 7:14 in the place of Virgin:

Strong's H5959
עלמה
‛ h
al-maw'

Feminine of H5958; a lass (as veiled or private): - damsel, maid, virgin.

The Hebrew word is il-mah which means damsel or maid. Our modern day understanding of what a virgin is has been totally misconstrued solely for the purpose of bringing forth this doctrine. Here's the true definition of what a Virgin actually is:

Zondervan Bible Dictionary pg. 600

Virgin: 1. A young unmarried woman; 2. A young woman of marriageable age, whether married or not.

As we can see, the original definition of virgin has nothing to do with someone's sexual history as we are taught in the western world. A young woman would be referred to as a virgin whether she was married or not.

You must remember this when you are reading about Mary being a Virgin. It simply means that she was a young maiden.

The prophecy of a Virgin or Maiden bringing forth a son was fulfilled in Matthew. 1:22-23:

Matthew 1:22 Now all this was done, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet, saying,

Matthew 1:23 Behold, a Virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us.


Where people get confused is Matthew. 1:18-20.

Matthew. 1:18 Now the birth of Yashaya (Jesus) Christ was on this wise: When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Spirit.

Now the birth of  Yashaya (Jesus) Christ was on this wise: This is giving us the wisdom or understanding of how Christ was born. When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph: At this point, Mary was engaged to Joseph before they came together: This is where a lot of people get tripped up.

When they see that is says, before they came together, they assume that this is speaking about before Joseph and Mary had physical relations. What this is speaking about is the coming together for a Hebrew wedding ceremony.

She was found with child of the Holy Spirit: When it states that Mary was found with a child of the Holy Spirit, this does not mean that the Holy Spirit (which is a feminine spirit) impregnated Mary. This means that the child that was in Mary's wound was a child that was filled with the Holy Spirit from birth. How do we know this:

Sirach 1:14 To fear the Lord is the beginning of wisdom: and it was created with the faithful in the womb.

To fear the Lord is the beginning of wisdom: Wisdom is the Holy Spirit according to precept (Wisdom Of Solomon 9:17). And it was created with the faithful in the womb: The scripture states that the Holy Spirit is present with the Most High's faithful from the time they are conceived in the womb. This gives us understanding as to what it means to be a child of the Holy Spirit.

Luke 1:13 But the angel said unto him, Fear not, Zacharias: for thy prayer is heard; and thy wife Elisabeth shall bear thee a son, and thou shalt call his name John.

Luke 1:14 And thou shalt have joy and gladness; and many shall rejoice at his birth.

Luke 1:15 For he shall be great in the sight of the Lord, and shall drink neither wine nor strong drink; and he shall be filled with the Holy Spirit, even from his Mother's Womb.


And he shall be filled with the Holy Spirit, even from his Mother's Womb: Here is Zacharias, John the Baptist's father, receiving a message from an angel concerning John's birth.


As we can see, it clearly states that John would be filled with the Holy Spirit even from his Mother's Womb. This is the same thing that happened with Christ a birth.

Luke 1:41 And it came to pass, that, when Elisabeth heard the salutation of Mary, the babe leaped in her womb; and Elisabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit:

And Elisabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit: John the Baptist's mother Elisabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit during her pregnancy with John, the same way Mary was promised to be filled with the Holy Spirit during her birth with Christ.

What is the significance of this? Though Elisabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit during her pregnancy with John the Baptist, Elisabeth had to first have Physical relations with Zacharias in order to bring John the Baptist forth.

Before we go any deeper into the account in Matthew, we will go over to the book of Luke first. The reason being is because the account in the book of Luke came before the account in the book of Matthew.

How do we know this? When you read the account in the book of Luke, you can clearly see that Mary was not yet Pregnant with Christ:

Luke 1:26 And in the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent from God unto a city of Galilee, named Nazareth,

Luke 1:27 To a virgin espoused to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David; and the Virgin's name was Mary.

Luke 1:28 And the angel came in unto her, and said, Hail, thou that art highly favoured, the Lord is with thee: blessed art thou among women.

Luke 1:29 And when she saw him, she was troubled at his saying, and cast in her mind what manner of salutation this should be.

Luke 1:30 And the angel said unto her, Fear not, Mary: for thou hast found favour with God.

Luke 1:31 And, behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and bring forth a son, and shalt call his name YASHAYA (JESUS).

Luk 1:32 He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest: and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David:

Luke 1:33 And he shall reign over the house of Jacob for ever; and of his kingdom there shall be no end.
Luke 1:34 Then said Mary unto the angel, How shall this be, seeing I know not a man?

Luke 1:35 And the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy Spirit shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God.

Luk 1:36 And, behold, thy cousin Elisabeth, she hath also conceived a son in her old age: and this is the sixth month with her, who was called barren.

Luke 1:37 For with God nothing shall be impossible.

Luke 1:38 And Mary said, Behold the handmaid of the Lord; be it unto me according to thy word. And the angel departed from her.


To a virgin espoused to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David: Notice that it states that Joseph was of the house of David. Christianity promotes the understanding of Mary being of the house of David. Rarely do you hear about Joseph's lineage linking to the David. Why is this significant? The Bible prophesied that Christ would come through the seed of David.

Then said Mary unto the angel, How shall this be, seeing I know not a man: At this point in time, Joseph and Mary had not yet had physical relations.

And the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy Spirit shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God:

When it states that the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee, many believe that this means that the Spirit of the Most High impregnated Mary. This can be broken down with common sense by just simply looking up the definition for overshadow:

Strong's G1982

ep-ee-skee-ad'-zo

From G1909 and a derivative of G4639; to cast a shade upon, that is, (by analogy) to envelop in a haze of brilliancy; figuratively to invest with preternatural influence: - overshadow.

The word impregnate cannot be found anywhere in this definition. We can now see that in the book of Luke, Mary had not yet physically dealt with Joseph. Yet, the account in Luke comes after the account in Matthew which is the account that shows that Mary and Joseph had already had physical relations. This is not by chance.

The Roman Catholic Church understood that in order to push this doctrine, they would need to place the Matthew account first. Therefore, when you read the Luke account, you will automatically believe that Mary was already pregnant without having Physical relations with Joseph.

Now let us go back to the book of Matthew to finish breaking down the understanding of how Joseph and Mary had Physical relations.

Matthew 1:19 Then Joseph her husband, being a just man, and not willing to make her a public example, was minded to put her away privily.

Then Joseph her husband, being a just man, and not willing to make her a public example, was minded to put her away privily: As I've mentioned earlier, when it states that Mary was found with child before they came together, this meant that Mary and Joseph had already bore a child before having a traditional Israelite ceremony of marriage.

In order to understand why Joseph was told to put her away privily, you must first understand the law of an Israelite wedding ceremony:

Deuteronomy 22:13 If any man take a wife, and go in unto her, and hate her,

Deuteronomy 22:14 And give occasions of speech against her, and bring up an evil name upon her, and say, I took this woman, and when I came to her, I found her not a maid:

Deuteronomy 22:15 Then shall the father of the damsel, and her mother, take and bring forth the tokens of the damsel's virginity unto the elders of the city in the gate:

Deuteronomy 22:16 And the damsel's father shall say unto the elders, I gave my daughter unto this man to wife, and he hateth her;

Deuteronomy 22:17 And, lo, he hath given occasions of speech against her, saying, I found not thy daughter a maid; and yet these are the tokens of my daughter's virginity. And they shall spread the cloth before the elders of the city.

Deuteronomy 22:18 And the elders of that city shall take that man and chastise him;

Deuteronomy 22:19 And they shall amerce him in an hundred shekels of silver, and give them unto the father of the damsel, because he hath brought up an evil name upon a Virgin of Israel (notice how it refers to a the young woman as a Virgin even after she has had physical relations with a man.): and she shall be his wife; he may not put her away all his days.

Deuteronomy 22:20 But if this thing be true, and the tokens of virginity be not found for the damsel:

Deuteronomy 22:21 Then they shall bring out the damsel to the door of her father's house, and the men of her city shall stone her with stones that she die: because she hath wrought folly in Israel, to play the whore in her father's house: so shalt thou put evil away from among you.


Then shall the father of the damsel, and her mother, take and bring forth the tokens of the damsel's virginity unto the elders of the city in the gate: The token of the damsel's virginity was a Sheet that was given to the man in order to lay upon the bed. When the man and woman laid down and had Physical relations, the blood of the damsels virginity would stain the sheet. The sheet was then taken and shown amongst the families who attended the ceremony to show that it the young woman was untouched when he received her.

But if this thing be true, and the tokens of virginity be not found for the damsel: Then they shall bring out the damsel to the door of her father's house, and the men of her city shall stone her with stones that she die: because she hath wrought folly in Israel, to play the whore in her father's house: so shalt thou put evil away from among you: If there was a situation in which the tokens of the damsels virginity be not found (if no blood is present on the sheet), then the damsel would be brought to the front of her father's house and stoned to death.

Why is this important to know? Because Mary and Joseph already had relations before the actual ceremony, there would be no possible way that Mary would have been able to present the tokens of her virginity. Therefore, if Joseph would have decided to go through with the ceremony, Mary would have been stoned to death. This is why Joseph was told to put her away privately. When it states that he didn't want to make her a public example, the public example would have been Mary being stoned in front of her father's house.

Some may ask, how we know that Joseph and Mary had already come together:


Matthew 1:19 Then Joseph her husband, being a just man, and not willing to make her a public example, was minded to put her away privily.

Then Joseph her husband: Matthew 1:19 refers to Joseph as Mary's Husband. As we have shown in Deuteronomy. 22, marriage according to Israelite law is consummated by Physical relations between and man and woman:

Genesis 24:67 And Isaac brought her into his mother Sarah's tent, and took Rebekah, and she became his wife; and he loved her: and Isaac was comforted after his mother's death.

Genesis 2:24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.

(A man and woman become one Flesh through Intercourse)

Matthew 19:3 The Pharisees also came unto him, tempting him, and saying unto him, Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife for every cause?

Matthew 19:4 And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female,

Matthew 19:5 And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?

Matthew 19:6 Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.


Here's the Zondervan Bible Dictionary definition for marriage:

Marriage: "is an intimate personal union to which a man and woman consent, consummated and continuously nourished by sexual intercourse."

As we can clearly see, marriage is consummated by sexual intercourse. Therefore, in order for Joseph to be called Mary's husband, they had to have Physically come together through Sexual Intercourse. When you go to Matthew 1:20, you can clearly see that Mary is referred to as Joseph's wife:

Matthew 1:20 But while he thought on these things, behold, the angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a dream, saying, Joseph, thou son of David, fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife: for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Spirit.

Luke 2:4 And Joseph also went up from Galilee, out of the city of Nazareth, into Judaea, unto the city of David, which is called Bethlehem; (because he was of the house and lineage of David:)

Luke 2:5 To be taxed with Mary his espoused wife, being great with child.


I briefly touched on earlier the understanding of Joseph being of the seed of David and its importance. All throughout the Bible, we can see prophecies of Christ descending from the root of David:

Isaiah 11:1 And there shall come forth a rod out of the stem of Jesse, and a Branch shall grow out of his roots

Ezekiel 37:24 And David my servant shall be king over them; and they all shall have one shepherd: they shall also walk in my judgments, and observe my statutes, and do them.

Ezekiel 37:25 And they shall dwell in the land that I have given unto Jacob my servant, wherein your fathers have dwelt; and they shall dwell therein, even they, and their children, and their children's children for ever: and my servant David shall be their prince for ever.


(When it says my servant David, it's speaking of the position that Christ would hold)

Isaiah 11:10 And in that day there shall be a root of Jesse, which shall stand for an ensign of the people; to it shall the Gentiles seek: and his rest shall be glorious.

(Jesse was David's father)

Christ of the seed of David (Seed is sperm Leviticus 15:16 And if any man's seed of copulation go out from him, then he shall wash all his flesh in water, and be unclean until the even. This can only come through a man, not a woman)

Acts 2:29 Men and brethren, let me freely speak unto you of the patriarch David, that he is both dead and buried, and his sepulcher is with us unto this day.

Acts 2:30 Therefore being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him, that of the fruit of his Loins, according to the Flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne;


Romans 1:3 Concerning his Son Yashaya (Jesus) Christ our Lord, which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh;

Romans 1:4 And declared to be the Son of God with power, according to the spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead:


So, Christ is of the son of David according to the Flesh and the Son of the Most High according to the Spirit. Christ is called the only begotten Son of the Father because the spirit, the spirit that was within him was the first spirit of a man child created in the heavens (Colossians. 1:15; Psalm. 89:27; John 1:14; Hebrews. 1:6).

Jeremiah 23:5 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will raise unto David a righteous Branch, and a King shall reign and prosper, and shall execute judgment and justice in the earth.

Jeremiah 23:6 In his days Judah shall be saved, and Israel shall dwell safely: and this is his name whereby he shall be called, THE LORD OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS.


Psalm 89:3 I have made a covenant with my chosen, I have sworn unto David my servant,

Psalm 89:4 Thy Seed will I establish for ever, and


Christ himself stated that he was of the offspring of David:


Revelation 22:16 I Yashaya (Jesus) have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star.

How do we know that the Seed of David that Christ would come through was Joseph opposed to Mary? Remember, was destined to sit upon the throne of David. He therefore, had to come through the lineage of kings. Who received the kingship after David:

1Kings 1:30 Even as I sware unto thee by the LORD God of Israel, saying, Assuredly Solomon thy son shall reign after me, and he shall sit upon my throne in my stead; even so will I certainly do this day.

Did Mary come through Solomon's lineage:

(You must read the lineage from the bottom to the top)

Luke the third chapter gives Mary's lineage


Luke 3:31 Which was the son of Melea, which was the son of Menan, which was the son of Mattatha, which was the son of Nathan, which was the son of David,

Luke 3:32 Which was the son of Jesse, which was the son of Obed, which was the son of Booz, which was the son of Salmon, which was the son of Naasson,


As we can see, the lineage goes from David to Nathan. Nathan was not selected to sit upon the throne of his father David.

How about Joseph's lineage:

Matthew 1:1 The book of the generation of Yashaya (Jesus) Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.

This is Christ's lineage through his father's side

Matthew 1:16 And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Yashaya (Jesus), who is called Christ.

Matthew 1:6 And Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her that had been the wife of Urias;

As we can see, both David and Solomon are contained in Joseph's lineage. Therefore, we can conclude that the Seed of David that Christ was prophesied to come through was Joseph. It was well known during Christ's time that Joseph was Christ's physical father:

Matthew 13:55 Is not this the carpenter's son? is not his mother called Mary? and his brethren, James, and Joses, and Simon, and Judas?

Matthew 13:56 And his sisters, are they not all with us? Whence then hath this man all these things?

The carpenter that it's speaking of is Joseph. Christ had physical brothers and sisters that were born of his father and mother as it mentions in Matthew. 13:55.

Luke 4:22 And all bare him witness, and wondered at the gracious words which proceeded out of his mouth. And they said, Is not this Joseph's son?

Mark 6:3 Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary, the brother of James, and Joses, and of Juda, and Simon? and are not his sisters here with us? And they were offended at him.

John 6:42 And they said, Is not this Yashaya (Jesus), the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? how is it then that he saith, I came down from heaven?

So, we can see that Christ clearly had a Physical father and mother. According to scripture, no King has entered into the earth without both a Physical mother and fathers:

This is a prophetic understanding of Christ's birth:

Wisdom of Solomon 7:1 I myself also am a mortal man, like to all, and the offspring of him that was first made of the earth,

Wisdom of Solomon 7:2 And in my Mother's Womb was fashioned to be Flesh in the time of ten months, being compacted in blood, of the Seed of Man, and the pleasure that came with sleep.

Wisdom of Solomon 7:3 And when I was born, I drew in the common air, and fell upon the earth, which is of like nature, and the first voice which I uttered was crying, as all others do.

Wisdom of Solomon 7:4 I was nursed in swaddling clothes, and that with cares.

Wisdom of Solomon 7:5 For there is no king that had any other beginning of birth.

Wisdom of Solomon 7:6 For all men have one entrance into life, and the like going out.


Hence Christ did not come in an angelic form as some like to claim:

Hebrews 2:9 But we see Yashaya (Jesus), who was made a little lower than the angels for the suffering of death, crowned with glory and honour; that he by the grace of God should taste death for every man.

Hebrews 2:16 For verily he took not on him the nature of angels; but he took on him the Seed of Abraham.

Hebrews 2:17 Wherefore in all things it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren, that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people.

Furthermore, Christ did not take on the nature of angels but the Seed of Abraham. When it says that it behoved Christ to be made like unto his brethren in all things, the same way Christ's brethren were born of a Physical mother and father, Christ was also born the same way. Or else, people would always have an excuse as to why they can't walk in the path of Christ.

Romans 8:3 For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the Flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful Flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the Flesh:

Therefore, Christ was sent in the likeness of sinful flesh just like his brethren were. What makes Christ special is that he was able to overcome his flesh in order to achieve perfection and to fulfill the will of the Father.

As you can clearly see-through Christian philosophy the masses have been deceived by churches not rightly dividing the Word of truth. Through thy precepts it’s clear that Christ and God are two separate entities working in union and Christ himself had a spiritual and physical father according to scripture.

I hope through the Wisdom of Spirit you all can get the understanding and not follow Semiramis and Tammuz.

 

 



Kaaba An Ancient Hindu Shiva Temple In Mecca HIJACKED by MOHAMMAD

Ahayah Yashiya's Blog

Kabaalishwaran Hindu Temple in Mecca 1950's



 

 

The original Tomb of Absalom, Kidron Valley, where passers by would throw stones. This tradition has been exported by Muslims to Mina in the Jamarat Valley.

 

 

KAABA

 

 

FACTS: 

 

1.) Islam is not a religion. It is corrupt, fabricated and created out of theft and loot.

 

2.)  It had no authentic prophet. It was confiscated.

 

3.)  It was an imaginary invention by a cruel robber who wanted to expand his empire.

 

4.) It was compiled as a potpourri of bits and pieces from other faiths, which the self-invented prophet of Islam gathered during his regular raids and attacks.

 

5.) The claim that Mohammed was a fabricated prophet can even be found in the Hadith’s, where one of Mohammed’s wives convince Mohammed that his hallucinations are a sign that he is a prophet.

 

6.) Thereafter at the late age of 40, the cruel and barbaric Mohammed decides that he must be declared a prophet.

 

7.) The Hadith describe Mohammed to have “meditated” in a cave at Hira. Meditation has no background in Islam but originates from the Hindu religion.

 

 

 

Furthermore Mohammed’s stepfather used to carve idols (Hindu idols for the local temple?. We say stepfather because Mohammed was born an orphan and breast fed by a slave, which indicates that he was probably an illegit child from a sexual encounter between a slave and her master. Mohammed was brought up by his slave mother and could neither read or write. He basically grew up in rough conditions, and the Hadith testifies that he earned his living on criminal activity.

 

The term “religion” for ancient Hinduism is not fully accurate. The oldest version of Hinduism before it turned into a religion was based on knowledge and instructions on a way of life that harmonized with existence. It was not held together as a religion and was not focused on a particular caste, origin, country. It was known as Sanathana Dharma, or eternal/perennial knowledge and intended for people from all backgrounds.

 

 

Pre-Islam, Mecca was known as one of the most important religious places of worship in the Arabian world. It appears to have been a multi-faith place of worship, with a large Jewish, Christian and pagan (Hindu) community co-existing. Their friendship is documented in the Quran that claims the people were all friends with each other, and are therefore to be seen as enemies to Muslims. There appears to have been many different temples, churches and synagogues in the region from which Mohammed and his men acquired loot, wealth, religious texts, and discoveries and inventions.

 

 

The Kaaba was already in existence when Mohammed and his gang of looters invaded Mecca and slaughtered its inhabitants. Anyone in his path was killed unless they converted to his new-found warlike religion. If they were wealthy and wanted to survive they had to pay jizya, extortion tax – an obligatory duty to all non-Muslims.

Parts of the Kaaba had then been ruined by floods during Mohammed’s age and Mohammed therefore reinstated the old temple. An argument took place as to whom would be allowed access to the confiscated temple. At the time the Kaaba contained 360 deities, including deities of the main planets, Hindu deities and from what appears to be looted Greek and Roman objects. It is our belief that the original Kaaba was the result of looting of religious artifacts from many major religious sources and tribes, thus Mohammed assumed Islam was the “complete” or “ultimate” religion.

 

It is an undeniable fact of history that before Muhammed was born, the local people worshiped deity”al-Ilah” (‘Allah’ of today) who had three daughters named al-Lat (Hubal, the mesopotamian moon god), al-Uzza (also known as Isis by the Egyptians–or Aphrodite by the Greeks) and Manat (the Nabatean goddess of time). The first two were even named after their father. Each daughter had a separate shrine near Mecca, where Allah’s shrine was located. Ironic Muslims refer to the Grand mosque as al-Haram. The words, حرم ḥaram and حرام ḥarām, mean both “forbidden” and/or “sacred”.

 

Although Islam forbids idol worship (a remnant from advaita, also known as non-dualism), and very strictly so, Muslims worship the black stone in the Kaaba and perform rituals around it.

In addition, many of the 360 idols surrounding the Kaaba remained although most were destroyed. The last idols got destroyed a mere decade ago by King Abdullah, which was mentioned in a newspaper article during the renovation and new constructions in Mecca.

The word Kabaa may originate from Tamil and the word Kabaalishwaran. Tamil is considered one of the oldest languages of the world. Dravidian’s worshiped Lord Shiva as their Primal Deity – from the Indus valley civilization. Shiva Temple’s in South India are called as Kabaalishwaran temple’s. Kabaali, therefore – refer to Lord Shiva.

There are many other words in Islam that appear to be connected to Hinduism. For example, in Sanskrit Allah, Akka and Amba are synonyms. They signify a goddess or mother. The Islamic practice of Bakari Eed (Eid) derives from the Go-(M)edh and Ashva-(M)edh Yagnas or sacrifices of Vedic times. Eed in Sanskrit means worship. The Islamic word Eed for festive days, signifying days of worship, is therefore a pure Sanskrit word.  [Note: The word Bakari is an Indian language word for a goat. Muslims sacrifice goats during Eid]

Since Eed means worship and Griha means ‘house’, the Islamic word Idgah signifies a ‘House of worship’ which is the exact Sanskrit connotation of the term. Similarly the word ‘Namaz’ derives from two Sanskrit roots ‘Nama’ and ‘Yajna’ (NAMa yAJna) meaning bowing and worshipping.
Recital of the Namaz (Nama-smaranam in Hindi) five times a day owes its origin to the Vedic injunction of Panchmahayagna (five daily worship- Panch-Maha-Yagna) which is part of the daily Vedic ritual prescribed for all individuals.

Four months of the year are regarded as very sacred in Islamic custom. The devout are enjoined to abstain from plunder and other evil deeds during that period. This originates in the Chaturmasa i.e., the four-month period of special vows and austerities in Hindu tradition. Shabibarat is the corrupt form of Shiva Vrat and Shiva Ratra.

The Islamic term ‘Eed-ul-Fitr’ derives from the ‘Eed of Piters’ that is worship of forefathers in Sanskrit tradition. In India, Hindus commemorate their ancestors during the Pitr-Paksha that is the fortnight reserved for their remembrance. The very same is the significance of ‘Eed-ul-Fitr’ (worship of forefathers).

In ancient Hinduism the ‘demons’ always return to the world to create havoc, misery and suffering and destroy the good that the sacred people have created. Is Islam this demon of our age, distorting itself as a (false) religion, and create its endless problems for other people in the world?

Is The Kaaba (Baytu l-’Atīq) An Ancient Hindu Temple?

 

King Vikramaditya inscription found in the Kaaba in Mecca proving beyond doubt that the Arabian Peninsula formed a part of his Indian Empire.

 

 

 

The text of the crucial Vikramaditya inscription, found inscribed on a gold dish hung inside the Kaaba shrine in Mecca, is found recorded on page 315 of a volume known as ‘Sayar-ul-Okul’ treasured in the Makhtab-e-Sultania library in Istanbul, Turkey. Rendered in free English the inscription says:

“Fortunate are those who were born (and lived) during king Vikram’s reign. He was a noble, generous dutiful ruler, devoted to the welfare of his subjects. But at that time we Arabs, oblivious of God, were lost in sensual pleasures. Plotting and torture were rampant. The darkness of ignorance had enveloped our country. Like the lamb struggling for her life in the cruel paws of a wolf we Arabs were caught up in ignorance.

 

The entire country was enveloped in a darkness so intense as on a new moon night. But the present dawn and pleasant sunshine of education is the result of the favor of the noble king Vikramaditya whose benevolent supervision did not lose sight of us – foreigners as we were.

 

He spread his sacred religion amongst us and sent scholars whose brilliance shone like that of the sun from his country to ours. These scholars and preceptors through whose benevolence we were once again made cognizant of the presence of God, introduced to His sacred existence and put on the road of Truth, had come to our country to preach their religion and impart education at king Vikramaditya’s behest.”

 

 

The destruction of idols at the Kaaba. Muhammad (top left and mounted at right) is represented as a flaming aureole. From Hamla-i haydarî (“Haydar’s Battle”), Kashmir, 1808.

 

 

The Hindu Empire Extended into Arabia

 

 



A careful analysis of the above inscription enables us to draw the following conclusions:

1. That the ancient Indian empires may have extended up to the eastern boundaries of Arabia until Vikramaditya and that it was he who for the first time conquered Arabia. Because the inscription says that king Vikram who dispelled the darkness of ignorance from Arabia.
2. That, whatever their earlier faith, King Vikrama’s preachers had succeeded in spreading the Vedic (based on the Vedas, the Hindu sacred scriptures)) way of life in Arabia.
3. That the knowledge of Indian arts and sciences was imparted by Indians to the Arabs directly by founding schools, academies and cultural centers. The belief, therefore, that visiting Arabs conveyed that knowledge to their own lands through their own indefatigable efforts and scholarship is unfounded.

An ancillary conclusion could be that the so-called Kutub Minar (in Delhi, India) could well be king Vikramadiya’s tower commemorating his conquest of Arabia. This conclusion is strengthened by two pointers.

Firstly, the inscription on the iron pillar near the so-called Kutub Minar refers to the marriage of the victorious king Vikramaditya to the princess of Balhika. This Balhika is none other than the Balkh region in West Asia. It could be that Arabia was wrestled by king Vikramaditya from the ruler of Balkh who concluded a treaty by giving his daughter in marriage to the victor.

Secondly, the township adjoining the so called Kutub Minar is named Mehrauli after Mihira who was the renowned astronomer-mathematician of king Vikram’s court. Mehrauli is the corrupt form of Sanskrit ‘Mihira-Awali’ signifying a row of houses raised for Mihira and his helpers and assistants working on astronomical observations made from the tower.

Having seen the far reaching and history shaking implications of the Arabic inscription concerning king Vikrama, we shall now piece together the story of its find. How it came to be recorded and hung in the Kaaba in Mecca. What are the other proofs reinforcing the belief that Arabs were once followers of the Indian Vedic way of life and that tranquility and education were ushered into Arabia by king Vikramaditya’s scholars, educationists from an uneasy period of “ignorance and turmoil” mentioned in the inscription.

 

The black stone (الحجر الأسود‎ al-Ḥajar al-Aswad) and its frame resembles the Yoni (vagina) part of the Hindu Shiva Linga to be ignored. Hinduism extended far beyond India at the time of warlord Muhammad and was referred to as a pagan faith and was very likely active in a multi-faith region before it was Islamized through violence and occupation. In old Indian literature Hinduism is referred to as a “pagan” practice.

The Hindu Rituals Used in Islam

 

Pre-Islam OKAJ Fair in Mecca – a Shiva Temple

But the OKAJ fair was far from a carnival. It provided a forum for the elite and the learned to discuss the social, religious, political, literary and other aspects of the Vedic culture then pervading Arabia. ‘Sayar-ul-Okul’ asserts that the conclusion reached at those discussions were widely respected throughout Arabia. Mecca, therefore, followed the Varanasi tradition (of India) of providing a venue for important discussions among the learned while the masses congregated there for spiritual bliss. The principal shrines at both Varanasi in India and at Mecca in Arvasthan (Arabia) were Siva temples. Even to this day ancient Mahadev (Siva) emblems can be seen. It is the Shankara (Siva) stone that Muslim pilgrims reverently touch and kiss in the Kaaba.

Arabic tradition has lost trace of the founding of the Kaaba temple. The discovery of the Vikramaditya inscription affords a clue. King Vikramaditya is known for his great devotion to Lord Mahadev (Siva). At Ujjain (India), the capital of Vikramaditya, exists the famous shrine of Mahankal, i.e., of Lord Shankara (Siva) associated with Vikramaditya. Since according to the Vikramaditya inscription he spread the Vedic religion, who else but he could have founded the Kaaba temple in Mecca?


Traces of Hindu Rituals in Muslim Hajj

A few miles away from Mecca is a big signboard which bars the entry of any non-Muslim into the area. This is a reminder of the days when the Kaaba was stormed and captured solely for the newly established faith of Islam. The object in barring entry of non-Muslims was obviously to prevent its recapture.

As the pilgrim proceeds towards Mecca he is asked to shave his head and beard and to don special sacred attire that consists of two seamless sheets of white cloth. One is to be worn round the waist and the other over the shoulders. Both these rites are remnants of the old Vedic practice of entering Hindu temples clean- and with holy seamless white sheets.

The main shrine in Mecca, which houses the Siva emblem, is known as the Kaaba. It is clothed in a black shroud. That custom also originates from the days when it was thought necessary to discourage its recapture by camouflaging it.

360 Hindu Deities in Kaaba

According to the Encyclopedia Britannica, the Kaaba has 360 images. Traditional accounts mention that one of the deities among the 360 destroyed when the place was stormed, was that of Saturn; another was of the Moon and yet another was one called Allah. That shows that in the Kaaba the Arabs worshipped the nine planets in pre-Islamic days. In India the practice of ‘Navagraha’ puja, that is worship of the nine planets, is still in vogue. Two of these nine are Saturn and Moon.

In India the crescent moon is always painted across the forehead of the Siva symbol. Since that symbol was associated with the Siva emblem in Kaaba it came to be grafted on the flag of Islam.

Hindu Circulation Around Ancient Kaaba Adopted by Muslim Occupiers

Another Hindu tradition associated with the Kaaba is that of the sacred stream Ganga (sacred waters of the Ganges river). According to the Hindu tradition Ganga is also inseparable from the Shiva emblem as the crescent moon. Wherever there is a Siva emblem, Ganga must co-exist. True to that association a sacred fount exists near the Kaaba. Its water is held sacred because it has been traditionally regarded as Ganga since pre-Islamic times (Zam-Zam water).

[Note: Even today, Muslim pilgrims who go to the Kaaba for Haj regard this Zam-Zam water with reverence and take some bottled water with them as sacred water.]

Muslim pilgrims visiting the Kaaba temple go around it seven times. In no other mosque does the circumambulation prevail. Hindus invariably circumambulate around their deities. This is yet another proof that the Kaaba shrine is a pre-Islamic Indian Shiva temple where the Hindu practice of circumambulation is still meticulously observed.

 

 

The practice of taking seven steps- known as Saptapadi in Sanskrit- is associated with Hindu marriage ceremony and fire worship. The culminating rite in a Hindu marriage enjoins upon the bride and groom to go round the sacred fire four times (but misunderstood by many as seven times). Since “Makha” means fire, the seven circumambulations also prove that Mecca was the seat of Indian fire-worship in the West Asia.

 

‘Allah’ Adopted and Misinterpreted from Sanskrit

It might come as a stunning revelation to many that the word ‘ALLAH’ itself is Sanskrit. In Sanskrit language Allah, Akka and Amba are synonyms. They signify a goddess or mother. The term ‘ALLAH’ forms part of Sanskrit chants invoking goddess Durga, also known as Bhavani, Chandi and Mahishasurmardini. The Islamic word for God is., therefore, not an innovation but the ancient Sanskrit appellation retained and continued by Islam. Allah means mother or goddess and mother goddess.

Quran Contains Looted Extracts from the Vedas

One Koranic verse is an exact translation of a stanza in the Yajurveda. This was pointed out by the great research scholar Pandit Satavlekar of Pardi in one of his articles.

[Note: Another scholar points out that the following teaching from the Koran is exactly similar to the teaching of the Kena Upanishad (1.7).

The Koran:

 

"Sight perceives Him not. But He perceives men's sights; for He is the knower of secrets, the Aware."

 

Kena Upanishad:

 

"That which cannot be seen by the eye but through which the eye itself sees, know That to be Brahman (God) and not what people worship here (in the manifested world)."

 

A simplified meaning of both the above verses reads:

God is one and that He is beyond man's sensory experience.

The identity of Unani and Ayurvedic systems shows that Unani is just the Arabic term for the Ayurvedic system of healing taught to them and administered in Arabia when Arabia formed part of the Indian empire.

It will now be easy to comprehend the various Hindu customs still prevailing in West Asian countries even after the existence of Islam during the last 1300 years. Let us review some Hindu traditions which exist as the core of Islamic practice.

Islamic Calendar Originates from Hinduism:
The Muslim Adaptation of Hindu Rituals

The Hindus have a pantheon of 33 gods. People in Asia Minor too worshiped 33 gods before the spread of Islam. The lunar calendar was introduced in West Asia during the Indian rule. The Muslim month ‘Safar’ signifying the ‘extra’ month (Adhik Maas) in the Hindu calendar. The Muslim month Rabi is the corrupt form of Ravi meaning the sun because Sanskrit ‘V’ changes into Prakrit ‘B’ (Prakrit being the popular version of Sanskrit language). The Muslim sanctity for Gyrahwi Sharif is nothing but the Hindu Ekadashi (Gyrah = elevan or Gyaarah). Both are identical in meaning.


Eid = Go-Medh [gom-edh]

The Islamic practice of Bakari Eed derives from the Go-Medh and Ashva-Medh Yagnas or sacrifices of Vedic times. Eed in Sanskrit means worship. The Islamic word Eed for festive days, signifying days of worship, is therefore a pure Sanskrit word. The word MESH in the Hindu zodiac signifies a lamb. Since in ancient times the year used to begin with the entry of the sun in Aries, the occasion was celebrated with mutton feasting. That is the origin of the Bakari Eed festival.
[Note: The word Bakari is an Indian language word for a goat.]


Namaz = Nama

Since Eed means worship and Griha means ‘house’, the Islamic word Idgah signifies a ‘House of worship’ which is the exact Sanskrit connotation of the term. Similarly the word ‘Namaz’ derives from two Sanskrit roots ‘Nama’ and ‘Yajna’ (NAMa yAJna) meaning bowing and worshipping.
Vedic descriptions about the moon, the different stellar constellations and the creation of the universe have been incorporated from the Vedas in Koran part 1 chapter 2, stanza 113, 114, 115, and 158, 189, chapter 9, stanza 37 and chapter 10, stanzas 4 to 7.

Recital of the Namaz five times a day owes its origin to the Vedic injunction of Panchmahayagna (five daily worship- Panch-Maha-Yagna) which is part of the daily Vedic ritual prescribed for all individuals.

Muslims are enjoined cleanliness of five parts of the body before commencing prayers. This derives from the Vedic injuction ‘Shareer Shydhyartham Panchanga Nyasah’.


Four Sacred Months in Islam = Chaturmasa

1st month = Muharram محرّم (or Muḥarram al Ḥaram)
7th month = Rajab رجب (or Rajab al Murajab)
11th month = Dhu al-Qi’dah ذو القعدة
12th month = Dhu al-Hijjah

Four months of the year are regarded as very sacred in Islamic custom. The devout are enjoined to abstain from plunder and other evil deeds during that period. This originates in the Chaturmasa i.e., the four-month period of special vows and austerities in Hindu tradition. Shabibarat is the corrupt form of Shiva Vrat and Shiva Ratra. Since the Kaaba has been an important centre of Shiva (Siva) worship from times immemorial, the Shivaratri festival used to be celebrated there with great gusto. It is that festival which is signified by the Islamic word Shabibarat.


Sanskrit Inscriptions Inside the Kaaba

Encyclopaedia tell us that there are inscriptions on the side of the Kaaba walls. What they are, no body has been allowed to study, according to the correspondence I had with an American scholar of Arabic. But according to hearsay at least some of those inscriptions are in Sanskrit, and some of them are stanzas from the Bhagavad Gita.

According to extant Islamic records, Indian merchants had settled in Arabia, particularly in Yemen, and their life and manners deeply influenced those who came in touch with them. At Ubla there was a large number of Indian settlements. This shows that Indians were in Arabia and Yemen in sufficient strength and commanding position to be able to influence the local people. This could not be possible unless they belonged to the ruling class.

It is mentioned in the Abadis i.e., the authentic traditions of Prophet Mohammad compiled by Imam Bukhari that the Indian tribe of Jats [Jains] had settled in Arabia before Prophet Mohammad’s times. Once when Hazrat Ayesha, wife of the Prophet, was taken ill, her nephew sent for a Jat physician for her treatment. This proves that Indians enjoyed a high and esteemed status in Arabia. Such a status could not be theirs unless they were the rulers. Bukhari also tells us that an Indian Raja (King) sent a jar of ginger pickles to the Prophet. This shows that the Indian Jat Raja ruled an adjacent area so as to be in a position to send such an insignificant present as ginger pickles. The Prophet is said to have so highly relished it as to have told his colleagues also to partake of it. These references show that even during Prophet Mohammad’s times Indians retained their influential role in Arabia, which was a dwindling legacy from Vikramaditya’s times.


Eed-ul-Fitr = Pitr-Paksha

The Islamic term ‘Eed-ul-Fitr’ derives from the ‘Eed of Piters’ that is worship of forefathers in Sanskrit tradition. In India, Hindus commemorate their ancestors during the Pitr-Paksha that is the fortnight reserved for their remembrance. The very same is the significance of ‘Eed-ul-Fitr’ (worship of forefathers).

The Islamic practice of observing the moon rise before deciding on celebrating the occasion derives from the Hindu custom of breaking fast on Sankranti and Vinayaki Chaturthi only after sighting the moon.

Barah Vafat, the Muslim festival for commemorating those dead in battle or by weapons, derives from a similar Sanskrit tradition because in Sanskrit ‘Phiphaut’ is ‘death’. Hindus observe Chayal Chaturdashi in memory of those who have died in battle.


Arabia = Arabasthan, Land of Horses

The word Arabia is itself the abbreviation of a Sanskrit word. The original word is ‘Arabasthan’. Since Prakrit ‘B’ is Sanskrit ‘V’ the original Sanskrit name of the land is ‘Arvasthan’. ‘Arva’ in Sanskrit means a horse. Arvasthan signifies a land of horses., and as well all know, Arabia is famous for its horses.

This discovery changes the entire complexion of the history of ancient India. Firstly we may have to revise our concepts about the king who had the largest empire in history. It could be that the expanse of king Vikramaditya’s empire was greater than that of all others. Secondly, the idea that the Indian empire spread only to the east and not in the west beyond say, Afghanisthan may have to be abandoned. Thirdly the effeminate and pathetic belief that India, unlike any other country in the world could by some age spread her benign and beatific cultural influence, language, customs, manners and education over distant lands without militarily conquering them is baseless. India did conquer all those countries physically wherever traces of its culture and language are still extant and the region extended from Bali island in the south Pacific to the Baltic in Northern Europe and from Korea to Kaaba. The only difference was that while Indian rulers identified themselves with the local population and established welfare states, Moghuls and others who ruled conquered lands perpetuated untold atrocities over the vanquished.

‘Sayar-ul-Okul’ tells us that a pan-Arabic poetic symposium used to be held in Mecca at the annual Okaj fair in pre-Islamic times. All leading poets used to participate in it.


Poetry in Arab Tradition Originates from Indian Tradition

Poems considered best were awarded prizes. The best-engraved on gold plate were hung inside the temple. Others etched on camel or goatskin were hung outside. Thus for thousands of years the Kaaba was the treasure house of the best Arabian poetic thought inspired by the Indian Vedic tradition.

That tradition being of immemorial antiquity many poetic compositions were engraved and hung inside and outside on the walls of the Kaaba. But most of the poems got lost and destroyed during the storming of the Kaaba by Prophet Mohammad’s troops. The Prophet’s court poet, Hassan-bin-Sawik, who was among the invaders, captured some of the treasured poems and dumped the gold plate on which they were inscribed in his own home. Sawik’s grandson, hoping to earn a reward carried those gold plates to Khalif’s court where he met the well-known Arab scholar Abu Amir Asamai. The latter received from the bearer five gold plates and 16 leather sheets with the prize-winning poems engraved on them. The bearer was sent away happy bestowed with a good reward.

On the five gold plates were inscribed verses by ancient Arab poets like Labi Baynay, Akhatab-bin-Turfa and Jarrham Bintoi. That discovery made Harun-al-Rashid order Abu Amir to compile a collection of all earlier compositions. One of the compositions in the collection is a tribute in verse paid by Jarrham Bintoi, a renowned Arab poet, to king Vikramaditya. Bintoi who lived 165 years before Prophet Mohammad had received the highest award for the best poetic compositions for three years in succession in the pan-Arabic symposiums held in Mecca every year. All those three poems of Bintoi adjudged best were hung inside the Kaaba temple, inscribed on gold plates. One of these constituted an unreserved tribute to King Vikramaditya for his paternal and filial rule over Arabia. That has already been quoted above.

Pre-Islamic Arabian poet Bintoi’s tribute to king Vikramaditya is a decisive evidence that it was king Vikramaditya who first conquered the Arabian Peninsula and made it a part of the Indian Empire. This explains why starting from India towards the west we have all Sanskrit names like Afghanisthan (now Afghanistan), Baluchisthan, Kurdisthan, Tajikiathan, Uzbekisthan,  Iran, Sivisthan, Iraq, Arvasthan, Turkesthan (Turkmenisthan) etc.

Historians have blundered in not giving due weight to the evidence provided by Sanskrit names pervading over the entire west Asian region. Let us take a contemporary instance. Why did a part of India get named Nagaland even after the end of British rule over India? After all historical traces are wiped out of human memory, will a future age historian be wrong if he concludes from the name Nagaland that the British or some English speaking power must have ruled over India? Why is Portuguese spoken in Goa (part of India), and French in Pondichery (part of India), and both French and English in Canada? Is it not because those people ruled over the territories where their languages are spoken? Can we not then justly conclude that wherever traces of Sanskrit names and traditions exist Indians once held sway? It is unfortunate that this important piece of decisive evidence has been ignored all these centuries.

Another question which should have presented itself to historians for consideration is how could it be that Indian empires could extend in the east as far as Korea and Japan, while not being able to make headway beyond Afghanisthan? In fact land campaigns are much easier to conduct than by sea. It was the Indians who ruled the entire West Asian region from Karachi to Hedjaz and who gave Sanskrit names to those lands and the towns therein, introduce their pantheon of the fire-worship, imparted education and established law and order.


Pre-Islamic Arabia – the Empire of King Vikramaditya

It may be that Arabia itself was not part of the Indian empire until king Vikrama , since Bintoi says that it was king Vikrama who for the first time brought about a radical change in the social, cultural and political life of Arabia. It may be that the whole of West Asia except Arabia was under Indian rule before Vikrama. The latter added Arabia too to the Indian Empire. Or as a remote possibility it could be that king Vikramaditya himself conducted a series of brilliant campaigns annexing to his empire the vast region between Afghanisthan and Hedjaz.

Incidentally this also explains why king Vikramaditya is so famous in history. Apart from the nobility and truthfulness of heart and his impartial filial affection for all his subjects, whether Indian or Arab, as testified by Bintoi, king Vikramaditya has been permanently enshrined in the pages of history because he was the world’s greatest ruler having the largest empire. It should be remembered that only a monarch with a vast empire gets famous in world history. Vikram Samvat (calendar still widely in use in India today) which he initiated over 2000 years ago may well mark his victory over Arabia, and the so called Kutub Minar (Kutub Tower in Delhi), a pillar commemorating that victory and the consequential marriage with the Vaihika (Balkh) princess as testified by the nearby iron pillar inscription.

A great many puzzles of ancient world history get automatically solved by a proper understanding of these great conquests of king Vikramaditya. As recorded by the Arab poet Bintoi, Indian scholars, preachers and social workers spread the fire-worship ceremony, preached the Vedic way of life, manned schools, set up Ayurvedic (healing) centres, trained the local people in irrigation and agriculture and established in those regions a democratic, orderly, peaceful, enlightened and religious way of life. That was of course, a Vedic Hindu way of life.

It is from such ancient times that Indian Kshtriya royal families, like the Pahalvis and Barmaks, have held sway over Iran and Iraq. It is those conquests, which made the Parsees Agnihotris i.e., fire-worshippers. It is therefore that we find the Kurds of Kurdisthan speaking a Sanskritised dialect, fire temples existing thousands of miles away from India, and scores of sites of ancient Indian cultural centres like Navbahar in West Asia and the numerous viharas in Soviet Russia spread throughout the world. Ever since so many viharas are often dug up in Soviet Russia, ancient Indian sculptures are also found in excavations in Central Asia. The same goes for West Asia.

[Note: Ancient Indian sculptures include metal statues of the Hindu deity Ganesh (the elephant headed god); the most recent find being in Kuwait].

Unfortunately these chapters of world history have been almost obliterated from public memory. They need to be carefully deciphered and rewritten. When these chapters are rewritten they might change the entire concept and orientation of ancient history.

In view of the overwhelming evidence led above, historians, scholars, students of history and lay men alike should take note that they had better revise their text books of ancient world history. The existence of Hindu customs, shrines, Sanskrit names of whole regions, countries and towns and the Vikramaditya inscriptions reproduced at the beginning are a thumping proof that Indian Kshatriyas once ruled over the vast region from Bali to Baltic and Korea to Kaaba in Mecca, Arabia at the very least.

Links to similar topics can be found via google. In the search box type Sword of truth Aditi Chaturvedi

The following explanation is reproduced from the Sword of Truth archives.


Quran’s Magic Number 786 – a Corrupt Backward Spelling of Vedic ‘AUM’

 

Figure 2. Read from right to left this figure of OM represents the numbers 786. Look at this symbol of Om in a mirror and you can make out the Devnagari (Sanskrit-Hindi) numerals 7-8-6

 

All Arabic copies of the Koran have the mysterious figure 786 imprinted on them. No Arabic scholar has been able to determine the choice of this particular number as divine. It is an established fact that Muhammad was illiterate therefore it is obvious that he would not be able to differentiate numbers from letters. This “magical” number is none other than the Vedic holy letter “OM” written in Sanskrit (Refer to figure 2). Anyone who knows Sanskrit can try reading the symbol for “OM” backwards in the Arabic way and magically the numbers 786 will appear! Muslims in their ignorance simply do not realize that this special number is nothing more than the holiest of Vedic symbols misread.

So Again The QURAN/KAABA/ISLAM is nothing but a HOAX!